.
Sept. 21, 2002
I've been doing research lately on products that are tested on animals
and I was surprised at how many products there are out there that still used to
blind, burn, and cripple animals for the sake of vanity and "safety".
By now I'm sure that most of the products used to maim animals for
"safety's" sake no longer require this further cruel research. I mean,
once you've established that Mr. Clean can burn a rabbit's eye balls out or that
Old Spice can be toxic if a guinea-pig is forced to guzzle down too much of it,
wouldn't the normal average human being (granted without much of a conscience)
write down "Hey, the ferret died from being gassed by too many fumes let
off by Comet. Case Closed. Time to move on."?
Not at the wonderful world of Procter & Gamble, where their motto
is "If it isn't human, it needs to be tortured for our well being."
But don't take *my* word for it. Read this wonderful
propaganda issued on their website. The essence of it is ... we torture and
maim, but we really do care!
A side note to those who aren't experienced in sniffing out corporate
bullshit:
When viewing a website or a corporate advertisement layout, check the
relevancy of the accompanying pictures with the text. The more ethnic persons,
women, and children they use (almost *always* smiling or laughing), the more the
heads of the company are white, greedy scum fucks who have absolutely no concern
with the well being of the buyers and the consumers. These pictures are
distractions. And what better way to throw off the public then by using imagery
that says "Hey! We're not prejudiced! We love blacks, women, and
children!" (how many blacks do you see as the head of any major million
dollar company? and how many women? I rest my case on the white, scum-crusted
glass ceiling)
Now, as an example of distracting imagery, take the picture on the Animal
Testing public statement at the top left (the ethnic woman and the smiling
ethnic child). What does this have to do with animal testing? Ok, now take the
wording used on the right of that page: "Animal care and treatment".
They basically claim that all animals tested on are in a safe magical wonderland
where dabbling Vicks vapor rub in eye sockets is an ok thing. In their
statement, they all but say that the animals love it.
"We conduct only the minimal amount of
animal testing on our non-drug and non-food products that is necessary to
prove our products are safe or to comply with government regulations."
Non-drug and non-food ... in other words "we only use the
animals to digest items that are not digestible and highly toxic."
They act like they're doing these animals a favor by doing this.
Another key note to mention: there are PLENTY of other companies that
provide the same type of products, who have FAR LESS money to go around, and
they don't even need to test their products on animals. So why does Procter
& Gamble still use animal testing? It's cheaper to get an animal from the
local pound or animal shelter or newspaper classifieds section than it is to
set up synthetic lab tests (though the lab tests are equally as effective and
do not involve testing on living beings). Their logic is: "Heck,
why spend all that money when we can get a free ferret, rabbit, or guinea-pig
from the local paper?" People are always giving away free
animals in the paper to "a good and loving home". What home could be
more loving than good ol' P&G's?
"Before any study using animals begins, a
special committee of veterinarians, scientists and community representatives
must approve the test plans. Each animal is given the best possible veterinary
care and treated with care and respect."
What respectable veterinarian in their right mind would let
experiments be done on animals, especially when toxic chemicals like cleaners
and bleach are being used? And frankly, if these people actually did CARE
about the animal's well beings, they would stop testing all together and go
with alternative research methods. Don't be fooled by the propaganda, folks.
They provide nothing but pure bullshit.
Below in the red column is a list of products by Procter & Gamble.
All products listed in this column are tested on animals or help fund the
testing on animals. Next to that list is an alternative list of products and
companies that do not test on animals. I will not tell anyone that they should
choose to buy different products. But they definitely should be more informed of
where their products are coming from. And in my personal opinion, I would rather
purchase items that do the same job as the ones produced by Procter &
Gamble, and know that the company that I am purchasing from does not use animal
vivisection.
To find more products that do not use animal testing &
vivisection, visit http://www.leapingbunny.org/
Type of Product: | Products
that
are tested on animals | Products
that are
NOT tested on animals |
Laundry & Cleaning: | Tide, Downy, Febreze, Gain, Cheer, Cascade,
Bounce, Dawn, Safeguard, Mr. Clean, Comet, Dreft, Joy, Solo, Orvus, Spic & Span, Swiffer, Top Job, Snow, Era |
Bon Ami, Ecos, Ecover, Seventh Generation, Sun
|
Soap: | Ivory, Zest, Coast | Basis, Bath & Body Works,
Body Shop, Garden Botanika, San Francisco Soap Company, Yardley |
Hair Care: | Pantene, Pert,
Plus, Vidal Sassoon, Physique, Prell, Ivory, Head & Shoulders | Agree,
Aussie, Aveda, Body
Shop, Citre Shine, Flex, Freeman, Helsa, Jheri
Redding, John Paul
Mitchell, Outrageous Hygiene Natracare, Seventh Generation |
Hygiene: | Always, Attends, Tampax | Natracare,
Seventh Generation |
Oral Care: | Crest, Scope, Cloraseptic, Gleem | Interplak, Lavoris,
Tom's of Maine, Topol Tooth Polish |
Make-Up & Facial Products: | Cover Girl, Max Factor, Clearasil, Clearstick, Noxema, Oil of Olay | Almay, Aveda, Aubrey Organics, Basis, Bobbi Brown, Clinique, Estee Lauder, Jane,
Kiss My Face, L'Oreal, Lancome, M.A.C.,
Mary Kay, Maybelline, Origins, Revlon, Ultima II,
Victoria's Secret |
Deoderant: | Secret, Sure, Old Spice | Almay, Lady Mitchum, Mitchum,
Tom's of Maine |
Fragrance: | Giorgio, Hugo Boss, Laura Biagiotti-Roma, Old Spice, Red, Venezia, Wings | Aramis,
Avon, Body
Shop, Beautiful, Chanel, Charlie, Crabtree & Evelyn, Garden Botanika, Liz
Claiborne, Tommy, Tommy Girl,
Victoria's Secret, White Linen |
Paper Products: | Charmin, Bounty, Puffs, Banner, Royale, Summit | Marcal,
Seventh Generation |
Respiratory Care: | Nyquil, DayQuil, Vicks Vapor Rub | equivalent products can be found at
Tom's of Maine |
Special thanks to 'A
Compassionate Consumer' for providing the table above for this web site's
publication.
|
.
|
.
|
|